Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2022) 01 CAT CK 0461

Dr. Sarv Priya Singh vs Sh. Anil Baijal

Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi · Decided on 12 January 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manjula Das, Chairman · Mohd. Jamshed, Member (A)
CASE NUMBER
C.P. No. 358/2021 in O.A. No. 2388/2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 204 words

This CP has been filed by the petitioner against the alleged contemnor for non-compliance of Order dated 27.10.2021 passed by this Tribunal.

2.

On 27.10.2021, when the matter was taken up by this Tribunal, the following Order was passed:-

“This matter relates to grant of subsistence allowance @75% from the date immediately after 90 days.

In view of that, issue notice to the respondents under Rule 11(1)(i) of CAT (Procedure) Rules, 1987 returnable within four weeks.

List on 17.12.2021. In the meantime, the subsistence allowance, if not paid, shall be paid to the applicant in accordance with law.”

3.

However, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the applicant has been granted subsistence allowance @50% instead of @75%. However, from the Order, it appears that as an interim measure, it was directed that if the subsistence allowance has not been paid, it shall be paid to the applicant in accordance with law. Accordingly, there is no such direction to give enhanced the subsistence allowance @75%, and it is for the concerned Authority to decide the subsistence allowance as per FR 53.

4.

In view of that, we do not find any contempt made on the part of the alleged contemnor. Accordingly, CP is closed.