Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2020) 11 CAT CK 0017

Dr. Sandhya Ranjan vs Union Of India & Others

Central Administrative Tribunal · Decided on 4 November 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
L. Narasimha Reddy, J · Aradhana Johri, Member (A)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Original Application No. 1094 Of 2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 276 words

L.Narasimha Reddy, J

1.

The applicant was initially employed in the medical department of State of Tripura. In the year 2000 she came on deputation to Central Health

Service and was absorbed on permanent basis on permanent basis on 26.09.2003.She claims to have earned promotions at various stages. The

respondents published a draft seniority list for the post of GDMO, on 21.05.2020. The applicant has raised her objections by submitting

representations. This OA is filed with a prayer to set aside the draft seniority list dated 21.05.2020 and to direct the respondents to grant seniority to

the applicant in accordance with the judgement dated 30.09.2015 rendered by this Tribunal and to extend the benefit of promotion at various stages.

2.

We heard Dr.Ashwani Bhardwaj, learned counsel for the applicant and Sh. Piyush Gaur, learned counsel for the respondents at length.

3.

From the perusal of the record it seems that the applicant has become more conversant with the law, though, we are not aware of her expertise in

the field of medicine. The synopsis furnished by her depicts the voluminous litigation that ensued at her instance.

4.

Be that as it may, what is published by the respondents is a draft seniority list. It is fundamental that an employee can have any grievance if only

final seniority list is published, ignoring the objections raised by him/her to the draft seniority list. Therefore, we are not inclined to entertain the OA.

However, the respondents need to take into account, the objections raised by the applicant, when they publish the final seniority list.

5.

The OA is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.