Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2020) 11 CAT CK 0016

Dr. Chandra Shekar vs Union Of India & Others

Central Administrative Tribunal · Decided on 4 November 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
L. Narasimha Reddy, J · Aradhana Johri, Member (A)
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Original Application No. 1235 Of 2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

23 paragraphs · 511 words

L. Narasimha Reddy, J

1.

The respondents issued a notification proposing to fill various posts, including the post of Assistant professor in the Central Health Service through

advertisement No. 07/2020. The maximum age limit is stipulated as 40 years. The applicant crossed that age. He filed this OA with a prayer to

declare the action of the respondents in debarring his candidature by not increasing the upper age limit from 40 to 45 years. He placed reliance upon

the order passed by the Hon’ble Madras High Court and the steps taken by the Medical Council of India in relation to the post of Senior Resident.

According to the applicant, the respondents have increased the maximum age limit for the post of Senior Resident from 40 to 45 years and though the

post of Assistant Professor occurs just above that,no steps were taken for enhancing the age limit upto 45 years.

2.

The Medical Council of India filed a counter affidavit opposing the OA. It is stated that the age limit for various teaching posts in the Government

and private establishments are stipulated by them and in the context of Assistant Professor the age limit is 40 years only. They also maintained a

distinction between the post of Assistant Professor, on the one hand and Senior Resident on the other hand.

3.

We heard Sh. Gaya Prasad, learned counsel for the applicant and Sh.Manish Kumar and Sh.T. Singhdev for respondent No. 2 and Sh. R. V. Sinha

with Sh. Amit Sinha for respondent No. 3 learned counsel for the respondents.

4.

The only controversy in this OA is about the maximum age limit for the post of Assistant Professor. The age limit as well as the qualifications are

stipulated under the recruitment rules for the post in the Central Health Service. The applicant does not dispute that as of now the rules stipulate the

age limit of 40 years. The UPSC has simply reproduced the requirements under the relevant rules in their advertisement and they are not stipulated

any new conditions.

5.

It may be true that for the post of Senior Resident, litigation ensued and on the basis of the decisions issued by the Medical Council of India, the age

limit was enhanced from 40 to 45 years. However, we find it difficult to apply the same for the post of Assistant Professor. Here itself it needs to be

mentioned that while Assistant Professor is a full fledged teaching post and the incumbent appointed would be entitled to be in service till he attains the

age of superannuation, the post of Senior Resident is a different one altogether. The selected candidate would function in the designated hospital for a

limited period and the training/experience which he gets for that period would enable him to be considered for appointment to the post of Assistant

Professor. Beyond that, it is neither a teaching post nor a regular one.

6.

Therefore, we do not find any merit in the OA and the same is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.