Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench(2023) 03 CAT CK 4048

Diksha vs Union Of India & Ors.

Central Administrative Tribunal · Decided on 3 March 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dr. Sanjiv Kumar, Member (A)
CASE NUMBER
Original Application No. 166 of 2023

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 213 words

O R D E R

Shri S. Dwivedi brief holder of Shri R.K. Shukla, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Chakrapani Vatsyayan, learned counsel for the respondents are present.

2.

At the outset learned counsel for the applicant states that the applicant will be satisfied if authority concerned amongst the respondents is directed to consider and decide the representation dated 08.09.2021 (Annexure No. A-6) said to have been moved by the applicant before the authority concerned, in a time bound manner. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents has opposed the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant.

4.

We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the records.

5.

In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel appearing for the applicant, no useful purpose will be served in keeping this O.A. pending. Therefore, without entering into the merits of this case, the O.A. is disposed of with a direction to the authority concerned amongst the respondents to decide the said representation dated 08.09.2021 (Annexure No. A-6) moved by the applicant by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

6.

With the above direction the OA is disposed of. No costs.