High CourtsDivision Bench(2024) 04 DEL CK 4312

Deep Jyoti Exports Pvt. Ltd. vs Union Of India & Ors.

Delhi High Court · Decided on 23 April 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J · Ravinder Dudeja, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
W.P.(C) 15317/2022 & CM APPL. 15019/2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 248 words

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)

1.

Petitioner seeks a direction to the Respondents granting refund besides interest for the delayed refund.

2.

As per the Petitioner, the application seeking refund is still pending and has not been disposed of. The refund pertains to the period August 2020 to January 2021, amounting to Rs. 44,94,004/-.

3.

Since the application seeking refund is still pending, the petition is disposed of, directing the proper Officer to consider the application in accordance with law and dispose of the same within a period of four weeks from today. In case the refund is found admissible and payable, the same be also disbursed to the Petitioner. In case the same is not found to be payable, a speaking order shall be passed and communicated to the Petitioner within a period of four weeks from today. The proper Officer shall also pass an appropriate order in terms of Section 56 of the Central Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017 with regard to payment of interest on the delayed refund, if any. In case interest is payable, the same shall also be disbursed to the Petitioner along with the refund. However, in case the same is not payable, reasons thereof be communicated to the Petitioner within four weeks.

4.

Petition is disposed of in above terms. It would be open to the Petitioner to avail of such further remedies, as may be permissible in law in case Petitioner is aggrieved by any order passed by the Respondents.