High CourtsDivision Bench(2024) 02 DEL CK 3831

Star Catalyst Through Prop. Amit Amarpuri vs Commissioner Of Delhi Value Added Tax & Anr.

Delhi High Court · Decided on 21 February 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J · Ravinder Dudeja, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
W.P.(C) 2546/2024 & CM APPL. 10446/2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 212 words

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)

1.

Petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to refund a sum of Rs. 11,78,453/-.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the subject return for the fourth quarter of financial year 2016-17 was filed within the prescribed time and due date for issuance of refund was 22.05.2018. He submits that as on date the applications are still being shown as pending. He submits that refund till date has not been processed and credited to the account of the petitioner.

3.

Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel for the respondents.

4.

Keeping in view of the facts and circumstances, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to process the application for refund of the petitioner in accordance with law. In case refund is found admissible, the same be paid to the petitioner along with the statutory interest as provided under Section 42 of the DVAT Act, 2004 and if the amount is not refundable, the reasons for the same be communicated to the petitioner to enable the petitioner to avail of such remedies as may be permissible in law. The exercise be completed within a period of four weeks from today.

5.

The petition is disposed of in the above terms.