High CourtsSingle Bench(1999) 07 P&H CK 0033

Darshan Kumar Goyal vs Gazebo Industries Ltd.

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 5 July 1999 · Citation: (2001) 1 RCR(Criminal) 636

HON’BLE JUDGES
M.L. Singhal, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 5838 of 1999 in Cr. Miscellaneous No. 4025-M of 1999

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 233 words

M.L. Singhal, J.—In Complaint No. 77/2 dated 12.6.1998 pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Ludhiana, accused appeared. On the accused appearing before the Magistrate, as the offence was bailable, the Magistrate admitted them to bail and called upon them to furnish the necessary bail bonds. He further imposed condition on them that they shall not leave India except with the prior permission of the Court. This condition was held to be bad and not sustainable vide order dated 11.2.1999 passed by this Bench in Crl. Misc. No. 4025-M of 1999.

2.

Now the complainant has moved an application namely Crl. Misc. No. 5838 of 1999 in Crl. Misc. No. 4025-M of 1999 wherethrough Gazebo Industries Limited (complainant-respondent herein) has prayed that Darshan Goyal and Dinesh Goyal be directed to furnish bank guarantee/surety of the amount equal to the amount of the cheque, which is the subject matter of the complaint u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act filed against them by the complainant (Gazebo Industries Limited).

3.

This direction is not at all permissible as no body knows whether in the Criminal Court, they will be convicted or acquitted. No body knows whether in the Criminal Court, Gazebo Industries Limited will or will not be able to prove issuance of the cheque-by them in discharge of some liability. This criminal Misc No. 53838/1999 fails and is dismissed.

4.

Petition dismissed..