High CourtsDivision Bench(2024) 02 DEL CK 4145

Court On Its Own Motion vs Narender Bhutani

Delhi High Court · Decided on 9 February 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Suresh Kumar Kait, J · Manoj Jain, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
CONT.CAS.(CRL) 9/2023

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 239 words
1.

Respondent/contemnor has filed an affidavit tendering unconditional apology whereby he has stated as under para 3, para 6 and para 7:-

“3.

Deponent is here by tendering unconditional apology to this Hon'ble Court and to the Learned Trial Court for an inadvertent remark made by Deponent in Paragraphs 16 and 28(b) of the written submission dated 15.07.2023.

6.

That the Deponent is having the blind faith and trust in the Hon’ble Judiciary and has never done any act to malign. Degrade, lower down the majesty and dignity of the Hon’ble Courts and Hon’ble Judges. Deponent did ot make any remark to scandalize or lower down the authority of any court or/and did not have any intention of the same.

7.

Deponent apologizes for what he had written in Paragraphs 16 and 28(b) of the written submission dated 15.07.2023. Deponent withdraws the remarks made in Para no.16 and Para no.28(b).”

2.

We have also perused the alleged remarks made by him in paragraphs 16 and 28(b) of his written submissions dated 15.7.2023.

3.

In view of the unconditional apology tendered by the respondent/contemnor and the undertaking given by him that he shall not commit the same again in future, we, hereby, accept the apology and discharge the respondent/contemnor from the contempt proceedings.

4.

It is also directed that the other party, i.e., wife shall not refer said remarks against the respondent/contemnor in future.

5.

Petition stands disposed of in aforesaid terms