CourtKutchehry.com
Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2018) 08 CAT CK 0038

Cheta And Ors vs Union Of India And Ors

Central Administrative Tribunal · Decided on 29 August 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
Praveen Mahajan, Member (A) · S.N. Terdal, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Review Application No. 146, 147 Of 2018, Original Application No. 2633, 2634 Of 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 188 words

Praveen Mahajan, Member (A)

1.

RA-146/2018 in OA-2634/2018 and RA-147/2018 in OA- 2633/2018 have been filed against the Tribunal's order dated 17.07.2018 vide which OA-3977/2017 with OA-2633/2018 and OA- 2634/2018 were dismissed.

2.

The review applicants in these two RAs have stated that on 17.07.2018 in OA-2633/2018 and 2634/2018, the following order was passed by the Tribunal:-

"Heard the learned counsel for the applicants.

OA is disposed of. Separate order will follow."

3.

After perusing the review applications, it is clarified that the above order quoted by the review applicants has been wrongly sent on cat website whereas vide order dated 17.07.2018 these were dismissed in limine being devoid of merit. However, even otherwise this will not make any difference in the decision of the Tribunal.

4.

Existence of error apparent on the face of record is sine qua non for entertainment of the review application.

5.

We have perused the judgment under review as also the grounds of review. We do not find any error apparent on the face of record warranting interference in exercise of the review jurisdiction.

6.

Review Applications are accordingly dismissed in circulation.