High CourtsSingle Bench(2026) 11 AP CK 1247

Chandra Paramasivam & Anr. vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh High Court, Amaravati · Decided on 4 November 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dr. Y. Lakshmana Rao, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Petition No: 9605/2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 748 words

Criminal Petition has been filed under Sections 480 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity ‘the BNSS’), seeking to enlarge the Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 & 2 on bail in Crime No.58 of 2026 of Paderu Urban Police Station, Alluri Sitharama Raju District, registered for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 20(b)(ii)(B) read with 8(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for brevity ‘the NDPS Act’).

2.

Mr. Balabhadruni Manohar, the learned counsel for the Petitioners, submits that the Petitioners are innocent of the alleged offence and they have been falsely implicated by the police. It is further submitted that the Petitioners are the sole earning members of the family and, therefore, their incarceration would cause undue hardship to their dependents. They are law-abiding citizens. The Petitioners undertake to strictly adhere to any conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, it is urged to allow the Criminal Petition.

3.

Per contra, Mr. A.Sai Rohith, the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the grant of bail to the Petitioners, submitting that the investigation is still underway and several material witnesses remain to be examined. It is contended that if the Petitioners are released on bail at this stage, there is a strong likelihood that they may abscond, thereby hampering the ongoing investigation and evading the process of law. Hence, it is urged to dismiss the Criminal Petition.

4.

Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioners and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. Perused the record.

5.

As seen from the record, the Petitioners are arrayed as Accused Nos.1 and 2 in this case. The Petitioners were arrested on 18.09.2026 and have been in judicial custody for the past 47 days. It is alleged by the prosecution that the Petitioners were found in illegal and conscious possession and transportation of 6 kgs of ganja. The seized contraband is not a commercial quantity. So far, five witnesses have been examined. The material portion of the investigation is completed. There is one adverse antecedent reported against each Petitioner. Petitioner No.1/Accused No.1 is involved in Cr.No.171 of 2024 of Ravikamatham Police Station, Anakapalli District, and Petitioner No.2/Accused No.2 is involved in Cr.No.293 of 2024 of II Town Police Station, Visakhapatnam City. No application has been filed seeking custodial interrogation of the Petitioners.

6.

The Petitioner No.1 is a permanent resident of State of Tamil Nadu and Petitioner No.2 is a permanent resident of Alluri Sitharama Raju District. They have got fixed abode. If the Petitioners are enlarged on bail subject to stringent conditions, there is no likelihood of their interfering with the investigation, threatening witnesses, or tampering with evidence.

7.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature and gravity of allegations levelled against the Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 & 2, this Court is inclined to enlarge the Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 & 2 on bail with some stringent conditions.

8.

In the result, the Criminal Petition is allowed with the following stringent conditions:

i.

The Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 & 2 shall be enlarged on bail subject to their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial First Class Magistrate, Paderu, Visakhapatnam District.

ii.

The Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 & 2 shall appear before the Station House Officer concerned, on every Saturday in between 10:00 am and 05:00 pm, till filing of the Charge Sheet.

iii.

The Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 & 2 shall not leave the limits of the State of Andhra Pradesh without prior permission from the Station House Officer concerned.

iv.

The Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 & 2 shall not involve themselves in the commission of any similar offence while on bail. The Investigating Officer is at liberty to file an appropriate petition seeking cancellation of bail in case of violation of this condition.

v.

The Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 & 2 shall cooperate with the Investigating Officer in further investigation of the case and shall make themselves available for interrogation by the Investigating Officer as and when required.

vi.

The Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 & 2 shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court.

vii.

The Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 & 2 shall surrender their passports, if any, to the Investigating Officer. If they claim that they do not have passports, they shall submit affidavits to that effect before the Investigating Officer.