High CourtsSingle Bench(2019) 02 DEL CK 0303

Central Bureau Of Investigation vs Moin Akhtar Qureshi

Delhi High Court · Decided on 14 February 2019

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sunil Gaur, J
RESULT
Disposed Off
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 760 Of 2019, Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 3098 Of 2019

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 336 words

Petitioner has aggrieved by trial court's order of 1st February, 2019 vide which respondent has been allowed to travel abroad upon furnishing of FDR/Bank Guarantee of Rs. 2 Crores.

Learned Special Public Prosecutor for CBI draws the attention of this Court to order of 18th December, 2018 (Annexure A-4) of co-accused-Pradeep, vide which a Coordinate Bench of this Court has allowed the co-accused-Pradeep to travel abroad upon furnishing of FDR/Bank Guarantee of Rs. 6 Crores and so, it is submitted that on parity basis impugned order deserves to be modified while requiring respondent to furnish FDR/Bank Guarantee of Rs. 6 Crores.

On the contrary, learned counsel for respondent submits that condition of furnishing of FDR/Bank Guarantee of Rs. 2 Crores is unjustified as liberty of an accused cannot be curtailed. It is submitted that respondent has filed an application before the trial court to reduce the FDR/Bank Guarantee amount from Rs. 2 Crores to Rs. 50,00,000/- as on earlier occasions, respondent has travelled abroad while furnishing FDR/Bank Guarantee of Rs. 50,00,000/-.

Upon hearing, on perusal of impugned order, order of 18th December, 2018 (Annexure A-4), reply of respondent and the material on record, I find that respondent was allowed to travel abroad earlier while furnishing FDR/Bank Guarantee of Rs. 50,00,000/- but to maintain parity with co-accused-Pradeep, respondent has to now furnishing FDR/Bank Guarantee of Rs. 6 Crores as the case of respondent and co-accused-Pradeep is said to be at par. In the reply filed by respondent it is not stated that respondent is not able to furnish the FDR/Bank Guarantee of Rs. 6 Crores.

In the facts and circumstances of this case, it deemed appropriate to put respondent at par with co-accused-Pradeep. Thus, impugned order of 1st February, 2019 is modified to enhance the FDR/Bank Guarantee amount from Rs. 2 Crores to Rs. 6 Crores.

With aforesaid modification, this petition and application are accordingly disposed of.

A copy of this order be given dasti to learned counsel for the parties under the signatures of Court Master.