High CourtsSingle Bench(2009) 06 MAD CK 0095

C.E. Pratap vs The Registrar, The Tamil Nadu Dr. Ambedkar Law University, The Controller of Examination, The Tamil Nadu Dr. Ambedkar Law University and The Dean, SOEL The Tamil Nadu Dr. Ambedkar Law University

Madras High Court · Decided on 24 June 2009

HON’BLE JUDGES
M. Jaichandren, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 6984 of 2009 and M.P. No. 1 of 2009

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 275 words

M. Jaichandren, J.—Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Counsel appearing for the respondents.

2.

At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents had placed before this Court the

communication from the State Public Information Officer, dated 12.06.2009, which is as follows:

With reference to your letters under Right to Information Act, 2005, I am herewith furnishing the following information received from the Controller

of Examinations of the Tamil Nadu Dr. Ambedkar Law University as follows:

It is informed that the steps are being taken to issue Degree Certificate titled ""Bachelor of Arts and Bachelor of Law (Hons.) "" and the same will

issued to the candidates in a course of time.

In such circumstances, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner had submitted that no further orders are necessary.

3.

The learned Counsel appearing for the respondents had submitted that the degree certificate, as prayed for by the petitioner, would be issued by

the respondent University, within a period of four weeks from today, on condition that the petitioner surrenders the certificate issued to him, earlier.

4.

The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that the degree certificate already issued to the petitioner, dated

13.2.2009, would be surrendered to the first respondent, on or before 1.7.2009.

5.

In view of the submissions made by the learned Counsels appearing on either side, this Court is of the view that no further orders are required to

be passed in the present writ petition. Hence, this writ petition stands closed. No costs. Consequently, connected M.P. No. is closed.