Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2023) 11 NCLT CK 2717

Canara Bank vs Lanco Hills Technology Park Pvt Ltd

National Company Law Tribunal · Decided on 6 November 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dr. Venkata Ramakrishna Badarinath Nandula, Member (Judicial) · Sh. Charan Singh, Member (Technical)
CASE NUMBER
IA (IBC) 1334/2023, MA (IBC) 3 & 4/2023 in CP (IB) No. 243/7/HDB/2022

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 182 words

O R D E R

Learned Counsel Mr. Manav Gecil Thomas, for the Financial Creditor and Learned Counsel Mr. M S Srinivas Iyengar, for Corporate Debtor present.

Orders not pronounced as the Financial Creditor through their counsel filed a memo with the photocopy of the enclosures letter dated 02.11.2023, and e-mail communication letter dated 03.11.2023 and 27.09.2023. It is stated in the memo that the corporate debtor came forward with a settlement offer and the same has been accepted by the Financial Creditor. Hence leave of the Tribunal is sought to withdraw the company petition with liberty to file fresh petition in the event of breach of terms of settlement.

Perused the memo and the same is taken on record. In the light of the memo nothing survives for adjudication of the Company Petition. Hence leave is granted to the Financial Creditor for withdrawal of the Company petition, with a liberty to file a fresh company petition as per law. Accordingly, the company petition is disposed of without costs. As Company Petition is disposed of all other pending IAs also disposed of.