AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
Caveat No. 2895/2018
Caveat stands discharged.
OWP No. 1068/2018
The case of the petitioner is that he is aggrieved against the order dated 11th May, 2018 passed by the respondent No. 1, whereby the Revision
Petition against the order of transfer has been entertained by the respondent No. 1 without having any question of law and public interest. It has
further been stated that the respondent Nos. 2 and 4 are not allowing the disposal of appeal pending before the Commissioner since 2008 under the
garb of frivolous litigations or transfer applications. The petitioner hence aggrieved, as the order impugned is in violation of the Section 21 of the
Agrarian Reforms Act, hence has filed the instant writ petition.
After hearing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would feel satisfied, if a direction is passed to the Revisional
Court that the case be decided within some stipulated time period. To this, other side has no objection. It is also submitted by the learned counsel
for the petitioner that at present, the Revisional Court has no Presiding Officer. To this, other side has also admitted that there is no Presiding officer.
In view of the above, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the instant writ petition with a liberty to petitioner to move an application before the
Chairman, J&K Special Tribunal, Jammu for transfer of case from Bench No. 3 to any other available Bench. Further, Revisional Court is
requested to decide the Revision Petition expeditiously, preferably within a period of one month from the date of receipt of Revision Petition by way of
transfer or otherwise.
With the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of along with connected MP.
