High CourtsDivision Bench(2020) 10 PAT CK 0083

Bipin Kumar Yadav vs State Of Bihar And Ors

Patna High Court · Decided on 15 October 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjay Karol, CJ · S. Kumar, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 8546 Of 2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 297 words

On the oral request of learned counsel, the Principal Secretary, Irrigation Department, Government of Bihar, Patna is impleaded as party respondent No.5. Registry to make necessary correction in the memo of parties.

Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):-

"That this writ application by way of public interest litigation is being filed for issuance of a writ preferably in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the respondent concerned to construct the pucca Bandh over the SURSAR river because in lack of maintenance, Bandh has been destroyed and crops swept away in flood water and as also to give compensation against the crops which is destroyed/ruined due to flood. And/or any other relief/reliefs for which the petitioner is found to be entitled to in the facts and circumstance of the case."

Considering the nature of grievance raised in the application, we are of the considered view that it would be appropriate if the petitioner were to first approach the Principal Secretary, Irrigation Department, Government of Bihar, Patna by way of filing representation.

The present application is, accordingly, disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate representation before the Principal Secretary, Irrigation Department, Government of Bihar, Patna within a period of two months. If such a representation is filed by the petitioner, the authority concerned is directed to consider the same dispose it of expeditiously and preferably within a period of two months from filing of such representation. Needless to say that while considering such request, principles of natural justice shall be followed and due opportunity of hearing afforded to the parties.

If aggrieved by the said order, the petitioner shall have liberty to approach this Court by way of separate petitions, if so required and desired.

With the aforesaid observations, this application is disposed of.