High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 07 KL CK 0008

BIJU, S /O CHERIAN vs VENGOLA GRAMA PANCHAYATH

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 11 July 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
K.Vinod Chandran
RESULT
Disposed
CASE NUMBER
19272 of 2016 (H)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

37 paragraphs · 337 words
1.

The petitioner is concerned with 2.4 Ares of property

in Survey No.333/2-2 and 1.52 Ares of property in Survey

No.333/3-6 in Vengola Village, lying contiguous. The

petitioner wants to construct a residential house therein.

The petitioner applied for such construction, which was

declined by the local authority as per Ext.P4. It is

submitted by the learned Government Pleader that, both in

the data bank as also the revenue records the property is

described as ''nilam''.

2.

This Court had directed the Local Level

Monitoring Committee (LLMC) to file a report after physical

inspection. The report of the Agricultural Officer is placed

on record and it has been specified that the LLMC, at

present, has not been constituted.

3.

The report of the Agricultural Officer is produced

along with memo dated 27.02.2017. The Agricultural

Officer and the Village Officer had together visited the

property. It is stated that from the apparent appearance of

the property, the property is a fallow wet land. A half

constructed house is also seen in the plot. It is stated that

there is mud path on the western and southern side of the

property, which leads to other small houses, similarly

constructed in the fallow wet land, after dividing it into

small plots. On the northern side there is a property in

which very old coconut palms, arecanut and other trees

were seen. The eastern boundary has a fallow wet land

lying as such after which, again, a house is seen

constructed in the next plot. The data bank indicates the

property to be ''nilam'' and so does the revenue records.

3.

The appropriate remedy of the petitioner is to

approach the LLMC for removal of the land from the data

bank and if the removal is permitted, the petitioner has to

approach the District Collector/Revenue Divisional Officer

(RDO) for conversion of user, as provided under Clause (6)

of the Kerala Land Utilization Order, 1967.

Leaving open such remedy, the writ petition is

disposed of, without any observation on merits. No Costs.