High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 08 KL CK 0028

MANIKANDAN. V., S/O. VELLIYANKIRI vs STATE OF KERALA

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 24 August 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
K.Vinod Chandran
RESULT
Disposed
CASE NUMBER
1995 of 2017 (Y)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 650 words
1.

The petitioner is aggrieved with the fact that the land, owned by the petitioner, having an extent of 0.1093 Hectors in R.S No.371/7 in Block No.37 of Marutha Road Village in Palakkadu District, is shown as "nilam" in the revenue records. The said property of the petitioner is said to be included in the data bank prepared under Section 5(4)(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act, 2008 (for brevity "the Paddy Land Act"). The petitioner filed Ext.P8 application, before the 3rd respondent, for removal of entry in respect of their properties from the draft data bank and Ext.P9; an application filed under Clause (6) of the Kerala Land Utilization Order, 1967, (for brevity "KLU Order") before the additional 5th respondent for conversion of use of land, which are pending consideration. The prayer of the petitioner is to direct the 3rd and additional 5th respondents herein, to consider and dispose of Exts.P8 and P9 applications

2.

In such circumstance, since, the petitioner in the aforesaid writ petition seeks a direction to the 3rd respondent to delete the property of the petitioner from the data bank and declare that the property of the petitioner is not liable to be included in the data bank. Such a relief can be appropriately sought before the Local Level Monitoring Committee as per the amendment brought to the Paddy Land Act by the amended Rule 4(6) of the Kerala Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008. Hence the 3rd respondent is directed to consider the request under the amendment G.O.(P) No.34/2017/Revenue dated 30.05.2017 for removing the property from the data bank after conducting site inspection and ascertaining the nature of land as on the date of enforcement of the Paddy Land Act and with report received from the Kerala State Remote Sensing and Environment Center (KSREC), if the application is filed in original and pending before the authority.

3.

Since the land is included in the draft data bank and the description is shown as "nilam" in the revenue records, it is only proper that a report is received from the Local Level Monitoring Committee (LLMC) and Kerala State Remote Sensing and Environment Center (KSREC) before consideration of Ext.P9 application by the additional 5th respondent, if the same is filed in original and pending before the authority.

4.

The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition before the Agricultural Officer, the Convener of the Local Level Monitoring Committee, along with the copy of the Field Measurement Book and Survey and Sub-division numbers with respect to the property obtained from the concerned Village Officer. The Agricultural Officer, shall seek a report of the lie and nature of the property as it remained on the date of coming into force of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act, 2008, from the Director, Kerala State Remote Sensing and Environment Center (KSREC), Vikas Bhavan, C-Block, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala 695 033. On the direction of the Agricultural Officer so to do, the petitioner shall remit the required fees in the name of the petitioners,

C/o. the concerned Agricultural Officer (showing the full address) before the KSREC for obtaining such report and produce such receipt before the Agricultural Officer. The Agricultural Officer shall then obtain the report and map from the KSREC, who shall issue the same on the strength of the receipt produced by the Agricultural Officer. The Agricultural Officer, on receipt of the report, shall require the LLMC to conduct physical inspection of the property and then the LLMC shall consider the application at Ext.P8 in accordance with law. If the LLMC permits it, the additional 5th respondent shall consider Ext.P9 application to obtain conversion of user under Clause (6) of the Kerala Land Utilization Order, 1967 and also in accordance with M.K.Shivadasan v. Revenue Divisional Officer [2017 (3) KLT 822].

The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs