High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 08 JH CK 0029

Bijoy Kumar Keshri vs Nirmala Devi & Ors

Jharkhand High Court · Decided on 13 August 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dr. S. N. Pathak, J
CASE NUMBER
Second Appeal No. 65 Of 2015

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 222 words

Dr. S.N.Pathak, J

I.A. No. 3027 of 2021

The instant interlocutory application has been filed under Order XXII Rule 4 read with Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for substitution of

legal heirs of Respondent No.5 namely Ashok Prasad Keshri (Proforma Respondent).

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the respondent No.5 has already died on 14.05.2021 during the pendency of the instant Second Appeal,

leaving behind his legal heirs/representatives as mentioned in para 3 of the instant interlocutory application and in the interest of justice and proper

adjudication of the case, their names may kindly be substituted in place of respondent No.5.

Having heard the learned counsel for the appellant and on being satisfied with the grounds taken in para 1 onwards of the instant interlocutory

application, the learned counsel for the appellant is permitted to delete the name of respondent No.5 and in his place, names of his legal heirs as

mentioned in para 3 of the said interlocutory application be substituted within a period of two weeks.

Accordingly, I.A. No.3027 of 2021 stands allowed.

S.A Case No. 65 of 2019

Issue notice to newly added respondents under registered cover with A/D as well as through Ordinary Process for which requisites etc. must be filed,

within a period of three weeks.

Put up this case after five weeks.