High CourtsSingle Bench(2026) 10 AP CK 2567

Bharatha Chaitanya Yuvajana Party vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh & Ors.

Andhra Pradesh High Court, Amaravati · Decided on 16 October 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Kiranmayee Mandava, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 30591 of 2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 281 words

Heard Sri Y. V. Ravi Prasad, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Umesh Chandra P.V.G, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Municipal Administration and Urban Development, learned Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Sri N. Ashwani Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents/APSEC.

2.

The grievance of the petitioner in the instant Writ Petition is against the action of the 3rd respondent in issuing the notification/schedule dated 14.10.2026 for the conduct of elections to the Urban Local Bodies/ Municipalities in the State of Andhra Pradesh by fixing three to four days for filing of nominations (from 16.10.2026 to 18.10.2026) instead of allowing the maximum period of six days, atleast upto as 20.10.2026 permissible under Section 33 of the Andhra Pradesh Municipal Corporations Act, 1994 (and the corresponding Rules for Municipalities). Consequently, the petitioner sought to direct the 3rd Respondent to extend the period for filing of nominations up to the maximum of six days or such further reasonable period as may be necessary until the caste/community certificates and No-Dues/NOC certificates are issued to all eligible applicants, and further direct the Respondents to issue the said certificates forthwith by manual or offline mode

3.

It is stated by the learned counsel for the respondents that the Municipal Election Notification has already been issued.

4.

In view of the issuance of the Election Notification and having regard to the constitutional bar as provided in Article 243-ZG of the Constitution of India, the Writ Petition is dismissed as not maintainable and the petitioners are at liberty to avail the remedies available under law. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed.