High CourtsDivision Bench(1921) 07 PAT CK 0017

Bhagwati Prasad Singh vs Bishun Pragash Narain

Patna High Court · Decided on 25 July 1921 · Citation: AIR 1922 Patna 386 : 70 Ind. Cas. 953

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bucknill, J · Adami, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 193 words
1.

The only question arising in this appeal is with regard to interest. The appellant obtained an ex parte decree in the Court of the Subordinate Judge, but the Court refused to grant interest after the period of grace. No reason is given why this is disallowed. As a matter of right, the decree-holder would be entitled to interest from the date of grace Up to the date of realisation and he should be granted interest at the rate of 6.per cent, per annum during the period. The appeal is allowed, and the decree will be amended accordingly.

2.

A question has been raised whether the, appellant is liable to pay Court-fee on the amount of interest from the date of grace up to the date of hearing of the appeal. It seems clear that he is not. At the time when the appeal, was filed, it was unknown what the amount of interest would be. Furthermore, there is the case of Vithal Hari Athavle v. Govind Vasudeo Thosar 17 B. 41 : 9 ind. Dec. (N.S.) 27 which supports our opinion. It is not necessary that a further Court-fee should be paid.