High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 03 P&H CK 0082

Bhagwan Goyal vs State Of Haryana And Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 4 March 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Alka Sarin, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3607 Of Civil Writ Petition No. 2021, 17134 Of 2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

20 paragraphs · 323 words

Alka Sarin, J

Heard through video conferencing.

CM-3607-CWP-2021

This is an application under Section 151 CPC for placing on record written statement on behalf of respondent nos. 2 to 11.

For the reasons stated therein, the application is allowed subject to all just exceptions and the written statement is taken on record.

CWP-17134-2020 (O&M)

The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of MANDAMUS directing

the respondents to pay the salary/remuneration of the higher post of CDC of SDO (current duty charge of Sub Divisional Officer) w.e.f. 14.11.2007

on which the petitioner worked in view of office order no. 197/UH/HR-II dated 14.11.2007.

Notice of motion was issued in this case and written statement has been filed wherein it has been stated that representations (Annexure P-6 and P-7)

were never received by the respondents and hence there was no question of taking any decision on the same.

Learned counsel representing respondent nos. 2 to 11 states that in case the representation is now filed before the concerned authorities the same

shall be considered in accordance with law.

In view of the statement made by learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 to 11, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he would be satisfied if a

direction is issued in the present writ petition to treat the writ petition itself as a representation on behalf of the petitioner and to decide the same in

accordance with law.

In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed off, without commenting on merits of the case, with a direction to respondent no.3, Chief

Engineer (Operation), UHBVN, Rohtak, to treat the present writ petition as a representation on behalf of the petitioner and to decide the same in

accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

Disposed off accordingly.