High CourtsSingle Bench(2026) 01 JH CK 1660

Basant Tiwari, S/o Late Shankar Tiwari vs State Of Jharkhand

Jharkhand High Court · Decided on 21 January 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 11529 Of 2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 338 words

Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J

Heard both the sides.

This bail application filed on behalf of  Basant Tiwari  who  is in custody since 08.10.2025 in connection with Namkom P.S. Case No. 188 of 2025 for the offence registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 316(2), 318(4), 352, 351(2) & (3), 61(2) of the BNS pending in the Court of J.M, Ranchi is pressed into motion. As per the FIR lodged by one Kiran Devi, Khushi Tiwari had duped her husband of Rs.11,20,000/- by entangling him in a love-affair. Khushi Tiwari is a married lady with one child. The money was extorted on a threat of making viral the obscene posts of her husband.

It is argued by the learned counsel on behalf of the petitioner that he happens  to be  father of the accused person-  Khushi Tiwari  and has  been  roped into the case to exert pressure on the petitioner. It is also argued that it is counter blast to Gonda P.S. Case No. 64 of 2025 lodged on 28.05.2025 under Sections 77, 79, 82(2), 82(1), 61(2), 351(3), 352 of the BNS and Sections 67(A), 66(D) of the IT  Act, by Khushi Tiwari against Kashinath Nayak who happens to be the husband of the informant in the present case.

Learned  A.P.P. for the State assisted by the counsel on behalf of the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that petitioner has criminal antecedent of similar nature and the amount has been received through bank transaction by the accused persons.

Having considered the submissions advanced, it appears that the present case is a counter blast to earlier case filed by the daughter of this petitioner and FIR does not disclose or state that said amount was credited in the account of this petitioner. Allegation is mainly directed against the daughter of this Petitioner.

Under the circumstances, the above-named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/-(Twenty-Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court below.