High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 03 CHH CK 0247

BALDEV vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 23 March 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
SANJAY K. AGRAWAL
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 795 of 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

50 paragraphs · 580 words
1.

Baldev S/o Pardeshi Aged About 36 Years Caste Pando, R/o Village Bonga, Post Govindpur, Tahsil Pratappur, District- Surajpur, Chhattisgarh.,

District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh

2.

Banarasi S/o Hardayal Aged About 30 Years Caste Pando, R/o Village Bonga, Post Govindpur, Tahsil Pratappur, District- Surajpur, Chhattisgarh.,

District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh

3.

Rajendar S/o Ramlal Netam Aged About 30 Years Caste Gond, R/o Village Bonga, Post Govindpur, Tahsil Pratappur, District- Surajpur,

Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh

4.

Bisheshar S/o Rante Aged About 30 Years Caste Agariya, R/o Village Bonga, Post Govindpur, Tahsil Pratappur, District- Surajpur, Chhattisgarh.,

District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh

5.

Sitaram S/o Daroga Aged About 35 Years Caste Pando, R/o Village Bonga, Post Govindpur, Tahsil Pratappur, District- Surajpur, Chhattisgarh.,

District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh

6.

Dilbasiya S/o Bhawarsai Aged About 65 Years Caste Pando, R/o Village Bonga, Post Govindpur, Tahsil Pratappur, District- Surajpur,

Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh

7.

Maniharo S/o Krishna Prasad Aged About 40 Years Caste Gond, R/o Village Bonga, Post Govindpur, Tahsil Pratappur, District- Surajpur,

Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh

8.

Birkumar Netam S/o Ramlal Netam Aged About 32 Years Caste Gond, R/o Village Bonga, Post Govindpur, Tahsil Pratappur, District- Surajpur,

Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh

9.

Singarmati W/o Kaudar Rante Aged About 40 Years Caste Agariya, R/o Village Bonga, Post Govindpur, Tahsil Pratappur, District- Surajpur,

Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh

10.

Shivbarat S/o Bisheshar Aged About 30 Years Caste Agariya, R/o Village Bonga, Post Govindpur, Tahsil Pratappur, District- Surajpur,

Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh

11.

Rajkumar Netam S/o Ramlal Netam Aged About 28 Years Caste Gond, R/o Village Bonga, Post Govindpur, Tahsil Pratappur, District- Surajpur,

Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh

12.

Ranglal S/o Tulsi Aged About 25 Years Caste Gond, R/o Village Bonga, Post Govindpur, Tahsil Pratappur, District- Surajpur, Chhattisgarh.,

District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh

---- Petitioners

Versus

1.

State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Forest, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.,

District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2.

State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur,

District-Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3.

Collector, Surajpur, District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh

4.

District Forest Officer, Surajpur, District- Surajpur, Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh

5.

Sub Divisional Officer, (R), Pratappur, District- Surajpur, Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh

6.

Sub Divisional Officer, (F), Pratappur, District- Surajpur, Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh

---- Respondents

For Petitioners : Smt. Asha Singh Poya, Advocate.

For Respondents : Mr. D.R. Minj, Dy. G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

Order On Board

23/03/18

1.

Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that they have made an application before the competent authorities for conferring the rights

(patta) under the Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006, which has not been considered and decided till date and, therefore,

directions may be issued to expedite the same.

2.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners.

3.

The prayer appears to be fair and reasonable and is accordingly allowed.

4.

Be that as it may, the competent authority, is directed to consider and dispose of the petitioners' application expeditiously preferably within a period

of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

5.

It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondent authorities would be at liberty to decide

the application of the petitioners in accordance with law.

6.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed