High CourtsSingle Bench(2019) 09 PAT CK 0032

Baijnath Nirman India Pvt. Ltd. vs State Of Bhaqr Through And Ors

Patna High Court · Decided on 5 September 2019

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 3332 Of 2017, 1804 Of 2015

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 354 words
1.

Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioners. Learned AC to AAG 6 for the State has assisted the Court.

2.

The petitioners has moved the Court alleging deliberate violation of the order dated 24.05.2017 passed in MJC No. 1804 of 2015, which in turn arose out of order passed in CWJC No. 18087 of 2012.

3.

The order dated 24.05.2017 passed in MJC No. 1804 of 2015 reads as under:

"As is evident from Annexure-A dated 23rd of January, 2013 passed by the Engineer- in-Chief, Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar cancelling the order of blacklisting and informing of all concerned about the fact that blacklisting order of the petitioner has been quashed, now no further action is required to be taken in the matter.

Accordingly, the application is disposed of in the light of the compliance made by the respondents."

4.

Learned counsel for the State submitted that the present application is absolutely frivolous as there is no violation at all and the petitioners have tried to misuse the order by showing lodging of FIR against him to be violation of the order when the order only indicated that the blacklisting of the petitioners had been quashed.

5.

From the pleadings and materials on record in the application itself, the contention of learned counsel for the State is found to be correct.

6.

In view thereof, the Court finds that the application is totally misconceived and filed with the purpose of exerting undue pressure on the authorities, which clearly is an abuse of the process of the Court, as allegation of contempt and prayer to punish, is a serious matter and nobody can be allowed to do so in a deliberately mischievous manner, as has been done in the present case.

7.

Accordingly, the application stands dismissed with cost of Rs. 50,000/-. The same be deposited in the Juvenile Justice Fund of the State Social Welfare Department and receipt filed within four weeks from today, failing which the Registry shall place the matter before the Bench for appropriate orders.

8.

Let the Registry communicate the order to the petitioners latest by tomorrow.