High CourtsSingle Bench(2026) 10 AP CK 2549

B. Ravi Kumar vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh & Anr.

Andhra Pradesh High Court, Amaravati · Decided on 15 October 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Nyapathy Vijay, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No: 30304/2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 447 words
1.

The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of the Respondents in not releasing the annual grade increments due to the Petitioner for the years 2022 and 2023 and to declare the same as illegal and arbitrary.

2.

The Petitioner was initially appointed as Typist in the year 1996 and was promoted to the post of Section Officer on 01.05.2011. While the Petitioner was working as Tahsildar in the office of the Tahsildar, Chodavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, he was placed under suspension w.e.f. 05.07.2021 due to his judicial custody for more than 48 hours. On 24.07.2023, the suspension of the Petitioner was revoked vide Memo.No.REV01-LANA0CCLV(ACBC)/25/2021-VIG-III-1, dated 24.07.2023. As annual increments were not sanctioned for the years 2022 and 2023, the present Writ Petition is filed.

3.

Learned counsel for the Petitioner relied upon Order passed by the Division Bench of this Court in W.P. No. 6617 of 2004, dated 04.11.2004 and similar Orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.9228 of 2021, dated 13.07.2021, W.P.No.4553 of 2021, dated 24.02.2021 and W.P.No.15504 of 2009, dated 16.04.2015 and W.P.No.36534 of 2025, dated 31.12.2025. This Court in similar circumstances had directed the Respondent-authorities to sanction the annual grade increments after referring to the provisions of F.R.24.

4.

Learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the Respondents would submit that the representation of the Petitioner for the purpose as sought would be considered by the Respondent-authorities and an appropriate decision would be taken.

5.

Heard both the counsel.

6.

The Division Bench of this Court in W.P.No.6617 of 2004 was considering the case of an individual seeking subsistence allowance after factoring in the annual grade increments. The Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal had directed that the subsisting allowance be paid after taking into account the annual increments. In the Writ Petition filed by the State, the Division Bench of this Court, after referring to the provisions of F.R.24, held that unless an order of withholding increments is passed, the same cannot be withheld.

7.

The said principle was followed in series of Judgments of this Court in W.P.Nos.9228 of 2021, 4553 of 2021 and 18004 of 2022.

8.

In that view, the present Writ Petition is allowed declaring the action of the Respondents in withholding the annual grade increments for the years 2022 and 2023 as illegal, and consequently, the Respondent-authorities are directed to release the annual grade increments due to the Petitioner for the years 2022 and 2023 within a period of one (01) month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

9.

There shall be no order as to costs.

10.

As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Petition shall stand closed.