High CourtsSingle Bench(2005) 03 DEL CK 0184

Azra Sultana vs State

Delhi High Court · Decided on 3 March 2005 · Citation: (2005) 118 DLT 115

HON’BLE JUDGES
Badar Durrez Ahmed, J
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 82 of 2004

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 200 words

Badar Durrez Ahmed, J.—The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that by an order dated 15.1.2004, the petitioner was directed to deposit a sum of Rs. 1 lakh which she had done. She was also directed to join investigation as and when required by the IO which also she has complied with. The learned Counselor the petitioner further submits that the co-accused Shakil Akhtar was granted anticipatory bail by this Court on 10.3.2004. Accordingly, on the ground of parity, he submits that the present petitioner also be granted anticipatory bail.

2.

The learned Counsel for the State, who appears in this matter, stated that it is a fact that the petitioner has deposited a sum of Rs. 1 lakh and that she joined investigation. It is also confirmed that the co-accused Shakil Akhtar was granted benefit of pre-arrest bail by this Court on 10.3.2004. In these circumstances, the petitioner is also directed to be released on bail, in the event of her arrest, on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer in respect of the aforementioned FIR.

The application stands disposed of.

dusty.