High CourtsDivision Bench(2024) 04 PAT CK 0066

Asha Devi vs Patna Municipal Corporation

Patna High Court · Decided on 22 April 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
P. B. Bajanthri, J · Alok Kumar Pandey, J
CASE NUMBER
Civil Review No. 302 Of 2019 In Letters Patent Appeal No. 1918 Of 2015, Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 5722 Of 2016, 21002 Of 2018, Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 1401 Of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 4723 Of 2016, Civil Review No. 476 O

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 592 words
1.

On 08.04.2024, in Civil Review No. 302 of 2019, arising out of L.P.A. No. 1918 of 2015 and connected litigations namely C.W.J.C. No. 5722 of 2016, M.J.C. No. 1401 of 2017 arising out of C.W.J.C. No. 4723 of 2016, Civil Review No. 476 of 2018 arising out of C.W.J.C. No. 4723 of 2016 and C.W.J.C. No. 21002 of 2018, the following order was passed:-

Learned counsel for the Patna Municipal Corporation, Mr. Prasoon Sinha, is hereby directed to ascertain from the records whether owner of the subject matter of premises has been notified in respect of violation of certain bye laws of the Municipal Corporation so as to proceed further in the matter.

Re-list this matter on 22.04.2024.

Respondents are hereby directed to maintain status quo in respect of subject matter of the premises in Building Vigilance Case No. 188-B of 2000.”

2.

Today, learned counsel for the Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna, on instruction, submitted that Smt. Asha Devi was not heard in the matter. On the other hand at each and every stage of the matter her late husband – Jitendra Singh @ Nepali Singh has been heard in the matter. In all fairness respective Opposite Parties should have raised a preliminary issue stating that late Jitendra Singh has no locus standi. On the other, as if, Asha Devi’s husband was real owner of the subject land, the case was proceeded from the office of the Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna resultantly in consequential litigations were decided either of the side as if Asha Devi’s husband - Jitendra Singh @ Nepali Singh was real owner. This was noticed only while filing Civil Review No. 302 of 2019 by Asha Devi and so also filing of C.W.J.C. No. 21002 of 2018.

3.

Taking note of these facts and circumstances order passed in L.P.A. No. 1918 of 2015 dated 20.12.2016 stands recalled while allowing Civil Review No. 302 of 2019, L.P.A. No. 1918 of 2015 stands disposed off. Further, C.W.J.C. No. 21002 of 2018 filed by Asha Devi stands allowed. Consequentially, C.W.J.C. No. 5722 of 2016 filed by Jitendra Singh @ Nepali Singh and M.J.C. No. 1401 of 2017, arising out of C.W.J.C. No. 4723 of 2016, filed by Kumar Ravindra Singh and Civil Review No. 476 of 2018, arising out of C.W.J.C. No. 4723 of 2016 filed by Jitendra Singh @ Nepali Singh (deceased) stands disposed of as it has become infructuous.

4.

In view of these factual aspects of the matter that subject matter of land stands in the name of Asha Devi, therefore, whatever the proceeding drawn by the Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna and other next higher authorities, including orders of this Court, are set aside. Matter is remanded to the Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna for fresh adjudication. At each and every stage, the Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna / competent authority is hereby directed to pass a detailed show cause notice from time to time against such of those persons, whose rights are likely to be affected by virtue of any proposed order to be passed by the Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna. On receipt of explanation from the respective parties proceed to pass speaking and reasoned order after due consideration of the each of the contention to be raised by the respective parties & communicate to all those necessary parties. If any party is affected by fresh decision he/her is/are at liberty to challenge the action in accordance with law. The above exercise shall be completed within a period of six months from the date of receipt of this order.