High CourtsDivision Bench(2026) 10 CAL CK 1666

Arun Kumar Chatterjee vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors.

Calcutta High Court, Appellate Side · Decided on 14 October 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J · Sandip Kumar De, J
CASE NUMBER
WPLRT 196 of 2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 218 words

Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.:

1.

Affidavit of service filed today be kept on record.

2. Although learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the private respondents have not been properly served, some of the private respondents are represented before us through counsel, along with the State.

3. In view of the nature of the order proposed to be passed, further service is not directed.

4. By the impugned order dated December 12, 2025, the learned Tribunal merely adjourned the matter as a last chance, that too, at the instance of the present writ petitioner, in respect of his application for recall of an earlier order passed by the Tribunal, by way of MA 437 of 2022 and MA 438 of 2022, filed in connection with OA 1421 of 2021 (LRTT).

5.

We do not find any irregularity or illegality in the impugned order.

6.

Accordingly, WPLRT 196 of 2026 is dismissed without any order as to costs, thereby affirming the impugned order dated December 12, 2025 passed by the First Bench of the West Bengal Land Reforms and Tenancy Tribunal in respect of MA 437 of 2022 and MA 438 of 2022 (OA 1421 of 2021) (LRTT).

7. Urgent photostat certified copies of this judgment, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.