High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 07 PAT CK 0020

Arpit Anshu vs State Of Bihar

Patna High Court · Decided on 9 July 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
S. Kumar, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Revision No. 292 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

25 paragraphs · 486 words

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The present revision application has been preferred by the petitioner against the order dated 26.02.2021, passed by learned 1st Additional Sessions

Judge cum Special Judge (Children’s Court), Sitamarhi, in Juvenile/Criminal Appeal  No. 04 of 2021, by which, the appeal of the petitioner for

grant of bail against the order dated 22.01.2021 of Juvenile Justice Board, Sitamarhi in J.J. Board Case No. 1039 of 2021 arising out of Riga PS Case

No. 27 of 2021 has been dismissed.

Informant in his written report has alleged that when he was on duty of vehicle checking motorcycle borne miscreants after seeing the police party

started fleeing away towards Riga but after chase they were apprehended who disclosed their name as Nilesh Jha and Arpit Anshu and on search

from the possession of Nilesh Jha one loaded country made pistol along with three live cartridges were recovered and from Arpit Anshu (appellant)

one mobile and stolen pulsar motorcycle were recovered.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case on mere suspicion. The recovered PULSAR

motorcycle is not a stolen property and in fact the said motorcycle has been purchased by the mother of petitioner from Md. Akib Akhtar. Md. Akib

Akhtar has signed over Form 29 and 30 which is the Form of transfer of ownership of a motor vehicle but in absence of some formalities the

ownership could not be transferred.

According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, no fruitful purpose will be served if the petitioner is allowed to remain in the Remand Home. It has

further been submitted on behalf of petitioner that from the record it does not appear that if the petitioner is released, he will be exposed to mental,

physical and psychological danger or is likely to bring him into association with any known criminal.

Considering the above, the order dated 26.02.2021, passed by learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge cum Special Judge (Children’s Court),

Sitamarhi, in Juvenile/Criminal Appeal No. 04 of 2021, is set aside.

The petitioner, above named, is directed to be released from the Remand Home on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/-with two sureties of like

amount each to the satisfaction of learned Juvenile Justice Board, Sitamarhi in connection with J.J. Board Case No. 1039 of 2021 arising out of Riga

PS Case No. 27 of 202 subject to the condition that:-One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his father/mother who at the time of filing of the

bonds, shall also give an undertaking that he/she will take good care of the petitioner and in case petitioner does not act as per his/her advice, he/she

shall report the matter to the office-in-charge of

  the concerned police station and further during period of bail, the petitioner will be under the supervision of concerned Probation Officer.

This revision application stands allowed.