High CourtsSingle Bench(2006) 08 JH CK 0070

Anirudh Singh vs The State of Bihar (now Jharkhand)

Jharkhand High Court · Decided on 18 August 2006 · Citation: (2006) 4 JCR 607

HON’BLE JUDGES
Amareshswar Sahay, J
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 450 of 2000 (R)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 298 words

Amareshwar Sahay, J.—Heard.

2.

The prayer of the petitioner in this application is for directing the respondents to pay the retiral dues by way of full Pension, Leave Encashment Amount and Refund of Rs. 25061/- (twenty five thousand and sixty one only), which according to the petitioner was illegally deducted from his pensionery benefit. Further prayer of the petitioner is to direct the respondent to consider and promotion to the post of U.D. Assistant w.e.f. 01.04.1974, to the post of Jr. Selection Grade w.e.f. 01.04.1981 and Super Selection Grade w.e.f. 01.05.1986 and Senior Selection Grade w.e.f. 01.09.1992.

3.

The case of the petitioner, as it appears that without any notice or proceeding, the amount of Rs. 25061/- (twenty five thousand and sixty one only) was wrongly deducted from his pensionery benefit, by the authority concerned and the petitioner has been denied his claim for promotion without any reason.

4.

Mr. Ram Kishore Prasad, learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the Authority should determine the claim of the petitioner for that he is ready to file afresh representation, stating in detail about his claims.

5.

In this view of the matter, this application is being disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to file representation, stating in detail about all his claims to the Deputy Commissioner, Latehar and if such a representation is filed by the petitioner, the Deputy Commissioner, Latehar, shall determine the claim of the petitioner one way or other way and shall pass appropriate order, in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation.

6.

It is made clear that I have not gone into the merit of the claim of the petitioner.

7.

With the above observation and direction, this application is disposed of.