High CourtsSingle Bench(2025) 09 AP CK 0422

Angam Padmaja, C/O. Kali Ravi Kumar vs State Of Andhra Pradesh & Ors.

Andhra Pradesh High Court, Amaravati · Decided on 8 September 2025

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dr. Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Petition No: 8925 Of 2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 375 words

Dr Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa, J

1.

The instant criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short ‘Cr.P.C)/under Section 528 of BNSS, has been filed by the Petitioner/Accused, seeking quashment of the docket order dated 11.07.2025 passed by the Special Magistrate, Nuzividu, Krishna District, in Crl.M.P.No.257 of 2025 in C.C.No.120 of 2023.

2.

Heard Ms.P.Lakshmi Priyanvita, learned counsel representing Sri S.M.Subhan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor takes notice on behalf of the State.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in compliance of the order passed by the Trial Court in Crl.M.P.No.257 of 2025 in C.C.No.120 of 2023, the petitioner has placed on record the original documents of the year 2021 to 2023 as ordered by the Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that the office has returned the said documents stating that they are not contemporaneous documents as ordered. Hence, they cannot be sent to Hand-writing expert for comparison.

4.

Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders.

5.

Having heard the submissions and a fair look at the material placed on record before this Court, as rightly put by the learned counsel for the petitioner, as ordered by the learned Trial Judge, the petitioner has placed on record the original documents for sending such documents to the expert for comparison. Learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that the office has taken an objection that they are not contemporaneous documents and returned such documents. That being the case, it is apposite to allow the petition, directing the learned Trial Judge to call the matter on bench and look into the issue and take appropriate decision over the matter, since, it is reported that the petitioner has complied with both the conditions i.e., depositing Rs.6,000/- and also filing the original documents of the year 2021 to 2023. Learned Trial Judge is further directed to take a decision over the matter and dispose of the case as expeditiously as possible without granting any adjournments in a casual way by mere asking.

6.

In the result, the Criminal Petition is allowed.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.