High CourtsDivision Bench(1985) 06 AP CK 0008

Ambica Chemical Products vs Income Tax Officer

Andhra Pradesh High Court · Decided on 14 June 1985 · Citation: (1991) 191 ITR 382

HON’BLE JUDGES
P. Sriramulu, J · K. Amareswari, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No''s. 5837, 5842, 5849 and 5854 of 1985

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 213 words

Amareswari, J.—Heard counsel for the assessee and the Income Tax Department.

2.

These writ petition are filed against the orders of the Income Tax Officer levying interest u/s 139 and 258(sic) of the Income Tax Act. The grievance of the petitioners is that the interest was levied without giving then any opportunity. Under rules 40 and 117A of the Income Tax Rules, 1962, framed under the Income Tax Act, the Income Tax Officer is vested with discretion to waive or reduce interest under certain circumstances. By implication, these rules require that an opportunity must be given to the assessee to show cause why interest should not be levied or to satisfy the Income Tax Officer that there is a case for waiver or reduction. In these cases, no opportunity was given. We, therefore, quash the orders to the extent of interest only. We give fifteen days'' time from today to the petitioners to file representations before the concerned Officers. No further notice need be issued by the Income Tax Officer. The Income Tax Officer shall consider the representations after giving a personal hearing to the petitioner and pass fresh orders in accordance with law. In all other respect, the impugned orders stand. With this direction, the writ petitions are disposed of. No costs.