High CourtsSingle Bench(2025) 11 P&H CK 1934

Amarnath vs UT Of Chandigarh And Ors

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 7 November 2025

HON’BLE JUDGES
Jagmohan Bansal, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 4157 Of 2017

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 184 words

Jagmohan Bansal, J.

1.

On 15.09.2025, the following order was passed by this Court:-

“The petitioner is claiming benefit of ACP. His claim was declined by respondent on 20.06.2016 on the ground that work charge period cannot be counted for ACP Scheme. As per respondent ACP Scheme dated 03.11.2006 clearly provides that service in cadre has to be taken into count for benefit. The petitioner was initially appointed as Beldar and thereafter appointed as work charge w.e.f. 21.12.1984. He was regularized in February’ 2007. The period of work charge cannot be counted for the purpose of ACP.

Learned counsel representing the petitioner seeks two weeks’ time to bring on record legal representatives on record.

Adjourned to 08.10.2025.

It is made clear that if no application is filed, matter would be adjudicated on the basis of available record.”

2.

There is no application as contemplated by aforesaid order. Further, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

3.

Dismissed with liberty to petitioner to move an appropriate application within three months from today, if cause survives.

4.

Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.