High CourtsSingle Bench(2011) 08 UK CK 0090

Akil vs State of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 23 August 2011

HON’BLE JUDGES
Prafulla C. Pant, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
1st Bail Application No. 578 of 2011

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 195 words

Prafulla C. Pant, J.—Heard.

2.

Applicant Akil, who is in jail in connection with Crime No. 466 of 2010, relating to offences punishable u/s 147, 148, 149, 302/34 I.P.C. Police Station- Kotwali Roorkee, District Haridwar has sought his release on bail.

3.

Learned Counsel for the applicant submitted that no specific role has been assigned to the applicant in commission of the crime. It is submitted that applicant Akil is a student, who has no criminal history. There are five accused said to have participated in the crime. Attention of this Court is drawn to the statement of Farhan (complainant) recorded u/s 161 of Code of Criminal Procedure in which role of firing has been assigned to one Abid and Adil.

4.

In the above circumstances, without expressing any opinion, as to the final merits of the case, this Court is of the view that applicant deserves bail.

5.

The bail application is allowed.

6.

Let the applicant Akil, be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar (Urgency application No. 3164 of 2011, stands disposed of)