High CourtsDivision Bench(2005) 12 BOM CK 0004

Ajay Pandit @ Jagdish Dayabhai Patel vs The State of Maharashtra

Bombay High Court · Decided on 12 December 2005

HON’BLE JUDGES
V.M. Kanade, J · D.G. Deshpande, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Appeal No. 46 of 2000

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 233 words

This Judgment has been overruled by : Ajay Pandit @ Jagdish Dayabhai Patel and Another Vs. State of Maharashtra, AIR 2012 SC 3422 : (2012) CriLJ 3909 : (2012) 3 Crimes 137 : (2012) 3 JCC 2255 : (2012) 6 JT 437 : (2012) 6 SCALE 464 : (2012) 8 SCC 43 : (2012) AIRSCW 4062 : (2012) 4 Supreme 572

1.

These matters were to be placed on board today. They are not shown on board. Advocate for the accused, therefore, appears to be absent for this reason. However, as per court''s direction production warrant was issued for production of accused Ajay Pandit @ Jagdish Patel. Accordingly he has been brought to the Court from Kolhapur. Police Officer, Mr. A.V. Shinde, PSI, who has brought the accused, states that the accused is brought from Kolhapur, but he is kept in Arthur Road Jail. Looking to the facts that the accused was called upon to show cause and his advocate is absent, the matter is adjourned for tomorrow i.e. 13.12.2005. Office to issue notice to the advocate for the accused, so also learned APP Mr. Shringarpure to communicate the advocate for the accused that the matter is kept tomorrow. Accused to be produced tomorrow at 11.00 a.m. in the Court and till tomorrow he shall be kept in Arthur Road Jail. Office to give copy of this order immediately to the Police Officer.