High CourtsSingle Bench(2015) 03 PAT CK 0134

Ainul Hassan vs State of Bihar

Patna High Court · Decided on 24 March 2015 · Citation: (2015) 2 BBCJ 425

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Appeal (SJ) No. 141 of 2015 (Arising Out of PS.Case No. -21 Year-2013 Thana-Magadh University District-Gaya)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 237 words

Ashwani Kumar Singh, J. (Oral) - This appeal under section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure read with section 156 of the Electricity Act, 2003 has been filed against the judgment of acquittal dated 3rd December, 2014 passed by the learned Special, Electricity, Magadh Area, Gaya in G.R. No. 42 of 2013/Tr. No. 302 of 2014 arising out of Magadh University P.S.Case No.21 of 2013.

2.

In my considered opinion, this appeal is thoroughly misconceived. Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure entitles a person convicted on a trial held by a Sessions Judge or an Additional Sessions Judge or on a trial held by the Sessions Judge or Additional Sessions Judge or on trial held by any other Court in which a sentence of imprisonment for more than seven years has been passed against him or against any other person convicted at the same trial, to file appeal to the High Court. Section 156 of the Electricity Act, 2003 confers power to this Court to entertain an appeal or revision against the judgment and order of Special Court or of the court of Sessions trying the cases under the Electricity Act, 2003.

3.

By no stretch of imagination, an appeal would lie before this Court on behalf of the accused, who has been acquitted for the offence punishable under the Electricity Act, 2003.

4.

The appeal, being devoid of any merit, is dismissed.

.