High CourtsSingle Bench(2008) 11 J&K CK 0020

Abida Begum and Others vs State and Others

Jammu And Kashmir High Court · Decided on 1 November 2008 · Citation: (2009) 2 JKJ 111

HON’BLE JUDGES
Virender Singh, J
RESULT
Allowed

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

17 paragraphs · 345 words

Virender Singh, J.—The instant application is for restoration of the bail application No. 59/08 which was dismissed by this Court on 3rd

Sept. 2008 on account of non appearance of the Learned Counsel for petitioners.

2.

Notice was issued. Mr. Rathore, had put an appearance. However, he has chosen not to come present today.

3.

I have heard Learned Counsel for the petitioners and gone through the order dated 3.9.2008 vide which the instant petition was dismissed.

Record of bail application No. 59/08 is also attached. Perused the same. Learned Counsel submits that both the petitioners are nomats and were

booked in case FIR No. 70/2008 u/s 366/109 RPC registered at Police Station Mahinder. Petitioners prayed for concession of the bail through

bail application No. 59/08 in which notice was issued to the otherside and an interim bail was also granted vide order dated 14.07.2008. Learned

Counsel then submits that in fact the instant petition was filed at Srinagar Wing after obtaining Special Leave from the Hon'ble Chief Justice.

4.

Learned Counsel then submits that one day i.e. on 3.9.08 he had not appeared before this Court as the petition was shown in the supplementary

list and, therefore, it was dismissed for want of appearance. According to Learned Counsel the main petition was not heard on merits and

therefore the petitioners pray that the main petition be restored for its disposal on merits. In support of his contention the Learned Counsel relies

upon a judgment rendered in Ramautr Thakur and Ors. v. State of Bihar AIR 1957 page 33; in which the same controversy had arisen with regard

to criminal revision which was dismissed in default without commenting on merits and the Hon'ble Court ultimately had ordered restoration of the

main petition.

5.1 find force in the submission of Learned Counsel for the petition and of the view that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by ratio of

the aforesaid judgment.

6.

Resultantly the instant petition is allowed. The main petition is accordingly restored to its original number and be listed next week.