High CourtsDIVISION BENCH(2017) 05 KL CK 0012

ABDUL SALAM S/O. MUHAMMED HAJI vs KERALA STATE WAQF BOARD

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 22 May 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
C.T.Ravikumar, Anil K.Narendran
CASE NUMBER
15050 of 2017 (E)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 238 words
1.

The petitioners are Sunni believers. They approached this

Court by filing the captioned writ petition with the following prayers:-

"(i) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction commanding the 2nd respondent to pass final orders in Exhibit P-1 proceedings numbered as O.P.No.115/2011 within the time fixed by this Hon''ble Court,

(ii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction commanding the respondents 3 to 5 to refrain from the inauguration of the reconstructed mosque, Chamal Mahal Juma Masjid, till the disposal of Exhibit P-1 petition by the 2nd respondent."

2.

Chamal Mahal Juma Masjid was already inaugurated on 15.5.2017. In

such circumstances, the second prayer does not survive. It is obvious

that prayer No.1 is for issuance of a writ of mandamus commanding the

2nd respondent to pass final orders in Exhibit P-1 proceedings

(O.P.No.115/2011) within a time frame. The learned counsel appearing

for respondents 1 and 2 submitted that Ext.P1 could be disposed of within four months. We are of the view that recording the said

submission this writ petition can be disposed of. In such circumstances,

it is absolutely unnecessary to issue notice to respondents 3 to 5.

Hence, this writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent

to dispose of Ext.P1 expeditiously at any rate, within a period of four

months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.