High CourtsSingle Bench(2007) 02 J&K CK 0005

Abbas Khan and Others vs Mohd. Farooq Matta

Jammu And Kashmir High Court · Decided on 26 February 2007 · Citation: (2007) 2 JKJ 238

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bashir. A. Kirmani, J
RESULT
Dismissed

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

16 paragraphs · 332 words

Bashir A. Kirmani, J.—Through this petition, the petitioners impugn trial Magistrate's order dated 11.12.2006, whereunder while taking

cognizance of criminal complaint against them u/s 420 read with 506 RPC, he directed issuance of process. Ground pleaded is that allegations

leveled by respondent against petitioners even if assumed to be correct reveal a civil cause which could not be taken cognizance on criminal side.

2.

During course of submissions while reiterating contents of petition the petitioners counsel has also contended that in given circumstances the

learned Magistrate could not have taken cognizance on criminal side, particularly because the offence of cheating and intimidation were on the face

of complainant itself alleged to have been committed beyond his jurisdiction. In reply the counsel for otherside has defended the impugned order

and while maintaining that the alleged offence certainly completed within jurisdiction of trial Magistrate with delivery of machinery to petitioner, and

as such he was within his powers to take cognizance thereof.

3.

I have heard learned Counsel and considered the matter. On face of it, the petition does not appear to be well founded, for the simple reason

that in the first instance the allegation made in the complaint which has been taken cognizance by learned Magistrate if proved, could ex-facie

constitute the offence of cheating etc., secondly, that even if the circumstances of the case suggest the civil liability of the petitioners that would not

per-se absolve them of criminal liability percolating from the set of allegations as mentioned in the complaint and finally that with receipt of

commodity/machinery regarding which the offence of cheating is alleged to have been committed at Srinagar the offence completes here and as

such the concerned Magistrate appears to have the jurisdiction to take cognizance thereof. In totality of circumstances, therefore, the objection

projected against taking of cognizance by Magistrate do not appeal.

4.

In the result, the petition is dismissed. Copy of this order be communicated to the Court below along with records, if received.