Kerala High Court Clarifies Arbitration Law: No Automatic Remand After Award Set Aside
Section 34 Does Not Mandate Fresh Arbitration
Case Arises From NH‑66 Land Acquisition Dispute
By Our Legal Correspondent
Kozhikode: March 04, 2026:
The Kerala High Court has ruled that setting aside an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 does not automatically result in remanding the matter back to the arbitrator. Justice C. Jayachandran delivered the judgment in a writ petition filed by a 69‑year‑old landowner whose property was acquired for widening of National Highway‑66 in Kozhikode.
Also Read: Actor Rajinikanth’s Property Lease Exempted from Service Tax
The petitioner had challenged the arbitral award relating to compensation under the National Highways Act, 1956. While the award was set aside, the court clarified that unless recourse is taken under Section 34(4), the matter cannot be remanded for fresh arbitration.
Background of the Case
The dispute arose when land belonging to the petitioner was acquired for NH‑66 expansion. Dissatisfied with the compensation awarded by the arbitrator, the petitioner approached the Kerala High Court under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
The key issue before the court was whether setting aside the arbitral award automatically required the matter to be sent back to the arbitrator for reconsideration.
[Recommended Research Resources]
📘 Legal professionals, families, individuals and students alike will benefit from Will Writing Simplified, which covers procedure and case law in detail. BUY TODAY HERE: Amazon 🔹 Flipkart
Also Read: Supreme Court Orders Employer to Deduct Salary for Wife’s Maintenance
Court’s Observations
- No Automatic Remand: Justice Jayachandran held that once an arbitral award is set aside, the matter does not automatically go back to the arbitrator.
- Section 34(4) Specificity: Only if a party seeks recourse under Section 34(4), the court may adjourn proceedings and allow the arbitral tribunal to resume proceedings to eliminate grounds for setting aside.
- Reliance on Precedent: The court referred to the Supreme Court’s ruling in Saisudhir Energy Ltd. v. NTPC Vidyut Vyapar Nigam Ltd., which clarified the scope of Section 34.
- Civil Remedy: The petitioner must pursue civil remedies rather than expecting automatic remand.
Legal Framework
Section 34 – Setting Aside Arbitral Awards
- Provides grounds on which a court may set aside an arbitral award (e.g., violation of natural justice, lack of jurisdiction, fraud).
- Does not itself provide for remand unless Section 34(4) is invoked.
Section 34(4) – Limited Remand
- Allows the court to adjourn proceedings and give the arbitral tribunal an opportunity to resume proceedings to remove grounds for setting aside.
- Requires a specific request from a party.
National Highways Act, 1956
- Governs land acquisition for highway projects.
- Compensation disputes often referred to arbitration.
Larger Implications
Also Read: Bombay High Court Quashes GST Bank Attachment for Lack of Reasons
- For Landowners: Clarifies that challenging compensation awards under arbitration does not guarantee a fresh hearing unless Section 34(4) is specifically invoked.
- For Arbitrators: Reinforces the finality of awards unless challenged on valid grounds.
- For Judiciary: Prevents unnecessary prolongation of disputes by limiting automatic remand.
- For Infrastructure Projects: Ensures smoother resolution of land acquisition disputes, avoiding delays in highway construction.
Also Read: Supreme Court: Arbitrator Can Decide Genuineness of Arbitration Agreement as Preliminary Issue
Conclusion
The Kerala High Court’s ruling in Raghavan V.T. v. Union of India provides important clarity on arbitration law. By holding that arbitral awards set aside under Section 34 do not automatically return to the arbitrator, the court has reinforced the principle of finality and limited judicial intervention. This judgment is expected to streamline arbitration proceedings and reduce delays in infrastructure projects involving land acquisition.
Keywords for Faster Search
- Kerala High Court arbitration award case
- Section 34 Arbitration Act India
- No automatic remand arbitral award
- NH‑66 land acquisition dispute Kerala
- Arbitration law India Section 34(4)
- Raghavan V.T. v Union of India Kerala HC
- Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Kerala ruling
Also Read: Maharashtra ‘Rocket Man’ Love Scam Exposes Dangers of Fake Identities