Haorongbam Maipaksana Singh Vs State Of Manipur & Ors.
.... ed for the respondents No. 5 and 9, despite service of notice. The learned GA appearing for the State respondents submitted that he has prepared the counter affidavit and the same will be filed within one week. The learned GA, accordingly, prays for taking up this matter after two weeks. ...
Manipur High Court (Imphal)
Nongmaithem Bilashini Devi Vs State Of Manipur & 2 Ors.
.... , learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, prays for allowing him to advance arguments after 2(two) weeks. Mrs. L. Monomala, learned G.A. and Mr. Kh. Tarunkumar, learned senior counsel, appearing for the respondents submitted that they have no objection. As prayed for, list these ...
Manipur High Court (Imphal)
S. Sanahanbi Devi Vs State Of Manipur
.... hanthem Bimol Singh, J Ms. Loha Lorina, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, prays for taking up this matter after 2(two) weeks on the ground that her senior has some personal difficulty. Mr. Th. Vashum, learned G.A. appearing for the respondent, has no objection. As pr ...
Manipur High Court (Imphal)
Rimanang Kahmei Vs State Of Manipur
.... , submitted that the main contesting respondent is respondent No. 2 and none represented the said respondent No. 2 today. On examination of the record, it is verified that notice upon respondent No. 2 has been duly served. However, none appeared for respondent No. 2 today. In the inte ...
Manipur High Court (Imphal)
Abujam Bimol Singh Vs State Of Manipur & Ors.
.... titioner. Issue notice, returnable within four weeks. Mr. Th. Vashum, learned GA entered appearance and accepts notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 3 and Mr. S. Jasobanta, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 4, hence no formal notice is called for. List these ca ...
Manipur High Court (Imphal)
U. Santi Singh Vs State Of Manipur & Anr
.... Ahanthem Bimol Singh, J When the matter is called up, none appeared for the appellant. Mr. Shyam Sharma, learned GA appeared for the respondent No. 1. As the counsel for the appellant is absent, let this case be listed again on 04-03-2024 ...
Manipur High Court (Imphal)
Patnam Uma Maheswari Vs Pallamreddy Venkata Sesha Reddy
.... led by both the parties and both the parties have been identified by their respective counsels. Both parties represented that they have agreed to the terms, which were incorporated in the Memorandum of Compromise entered into between them and requested to dispose of the second appeal by recordin ...
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amaravati
Jagdish Sharma Vs Navtej Singh And Others
.... ot have been able to concentrate on his business because of the extensive injuries. 14. The injured examined PW2/Shri Hitender, Tax Assistant from the Income Tax Department, who proved the ITR‟s of the injured for the Assessment Years 2013-14, 2014-15 and 2015-16, Ex.PW2/2, Ex.PW2/3 a ...
Delhi High Court
Walnut Pictures And Ors Vs Rajyesh Patni
.... 6.4 In the case of Lanka Venkateshwarlu vs State of Andhra Pradesh, (2011) 4 SCC 363, the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India observed thus : "19. We have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel. At the outset, it needs to be stated that generally speaking, the courts in t ...
Delhi High Court
Aizaz Kilicheva @ Aziza @ Maya Vs State Nct Of Delhi
.... thout granting any additional relief to the petitioner in the meantime. 23. Insofar as the judgment of a Co-ordinate Bench in Emechere Maduabuchkwu vs. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr . 2023 SCC OnLine Del 3323 is concerned, the FRRO submits, that they have preferred Special Leave Petitions ...
Delhi High Court
Get In Touch With Us
We are here to help. Want to learn more about our services? Please get in touch, we'd love to hear from you!
