High CourtsSingle Bench(2020) 12 P&H CK 0182

Yogender vs State Of Haryana

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 10 December 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Gurvinder Singh Gill, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 35660 Of 2020 (O&M)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

18 paragraphs · 369 words

Gurvinder Singh Gill, J

1.

The petitioner has approached this Court seeking grant of regular bail in respect of a case registered vide FIR No.550 dated 23.9.2020 at Police

Station Camp Palwal, District Palwal under Sections 224, 458, 212 and 120-B of Indian Penal Code, 1860.

2.

The allegations, in nutshell, are that the complainant who is working as a Peon with a Judicial Officer in Palwal noticed that a boy was hiding by the

side of a wall in the residence of Judicial Officer and who was carrying a bolt of a door in his hand. It is alleged that the said boy even tried to launch

attack upon the complainant but the complainant was able to overpower him.

3.

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case and that neither any loss was

caused to any property nor anybody was injured and in any case as of now investigation has concluded and challan stands presented and as such, the

petitioner is no longer required to be detained.

4.

Opposing the petition, the learned State counsel has submitted that since the petitioner was caught red-handed at the spot while he had trespassed

into the house of the Judicial Officer and was armed with a handle which could be used as a weapon, no case for grant of bail is made out. The

learned State counsel, upon instructions from Head Constable Shiv Kumar, has, however, informed that the petitioner as on date has been behind bars

since the last more than 2 months and that challan already stands presented. The learned State counsel has informed that there is one more case

lodged against the petitioner for offences under Sections 490 and 465 IPC etc.

5.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of allegations as levelled in the FIR and while noticing that challan already

stands presented, further detention of the petitioner will not serve any useful purpose. The petition, as such, is accepted and the petitioner is ordered to

be released on regular bail on his furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of learned Trial Court/Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty

Magistrate concerned.