Tribunals and CommissionsFull Bench(2022) 05 NCLAT CK 0089

Yes Bank Ltd vs Suresh Kumar Jain & Ors

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 30 May 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ashok Bhushan, Chairperson · Shreesha Merla, Member (T) · Naresh Salecha, Member (T)
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 603 Of 2022

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 305 words
1.

This Appeal has been filed by the Financial Creditor challenging the order passed by the Adjudicating Authority dated 12.01.2022 by which application filed under Section 60(5) r/w Section 25, 68, 14, 231 & 238 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 has been rejected. The Resolution Professional in the application has prayed for following reliefs:

“i. Issue notice and call for the presence of respondents and take appropriate action thereby cancelling the sale deeds attached to this application and declare all of these sale deeds as null and void.

ii. Restore physical possession and control of the properties/flats mentioned in sale deeds attached to this application for all purposes to the applicant/RP and permit to put the same in the pool of assets of Corporate Debtor.

iii. Pass such order or further order as may be deemed just and fit under the circumstances of the case.”

2.

The CIRP against the Corporate Debtor was initiated by order dated 19.09.2019 on Section 7 Application filed by a Financial Creditor. The Sale Deeds which were sought to be cancelled were executed by the Corporate Debtor prior to the CIRP. We are of the view that there was no occasion to cancel the Sale Deed in the application which was filed by the Resolution Professional under Section 60(5) r/w Section 25, 68, 14, 231 & 238 and the Adjudicating Authority has rightly rejected the Application. We uphold the order of the Adjudicating Authority rejecting the application on the ground that such prayer cannot be entertained on an application filed by the Resolution Professional. However, we are of the view that since prayer for cancelling the Sale Deeds could not have been entertained the observations made in the impugned order may not prejudice the parties in any other proceeding in accordance with law. The Appeal is dismissed accordingly.