High CourtsSingle Bench(1921) 07 AHC CK 0001

Yad Ram and Another vs Baldeo Singh

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 20 July 1921 · Citation: 64 Ind. Cas. 418

HON’BLE JUDGES
Stuart, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 151 words

Stuart, J.—This appeal refers to a mortgage of occupancy rights in a holding made before Local Act II of 1901 come into force. The mortgage of occupancy rights was a legal mortgage. The mortgagor has subsequently relinquished his rights in favour of his Zemindar for a cash consideration. The resignation coupled with the cash comideration amounted to a transfer of the right to redeem to the Zemindar. The first plea taken in the grounds of appeal that there was no effective transfer to the plaintiff respondent fails. The plaintiff respondent had a right to redeem. The second plea taken in the grounds of appeal fails in view of the decision of the Fall Bench ruling in Raghunandan Rai v. Raghunandan Pande 61 I. C. 812 : 19 A.L.J. 573 : 43 A. 638. I, therefore, dismiss this appeal with costs, which will include in this Court fees on the higher scale.