Supreme CourtFull Bench(2000) 01 SC CK 0126

Wine Agencies vs Financial Commissioner, Revenue and Others

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 20 January 2000 · Citation: AIR 2000 SC 3574 : (2000) AIRSCW 3734 : (2000) 8 JT 166 : (2000) 7 Supreme 78 : (2000) 7 Supreme 418

HON’BLE JUDGES
A. S. Anand, C.J · S. Rajendra Babu, J · R. C. Lahoti, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal No''s. 11551-11552 of 1996

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 168 words

Dr. A.S. Anand, C.J.I.

1.

Aggrieved by an order passed by the Excise and Taxation Commissioner exercising the powers of Financial Commissioner, the appellant herein filed an appeal though after expiry of the prescribed period of limitation. The Appellate Authority was not satisfied about the justification for delay and declined to condone the delay and dismissed the appeal as barred by time. The order of the Appellate Authority, rejecting the appeal, as barred by time, was put in issue through a writ petition in the High Court. The Division Bench of the High Court opined that there was no explanation furnished by the appellant for the delay in filing the writ petition after expiry of more than a year after dismissal of the appeal. The High Court declined to entertain the writ petition on that ground. We have examined the record and do not find any error to have been committed by the High Court in that behalf. These appeals, therefore, fail and are accordingly dismissed. No costs.