Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench(2026) 03 ITAT CK 2888

White Page Consulting Pvt. Ltd. vs ITO, Ward 27(1), Delhi, AO Range-46, AO Number 93, New Delhi

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 19 March 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Satbeer Singh Godara, Judicial Member
CASE NUMBER
ITA No.819/Del/2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 577 words

ORDER

This assessee’s appeal for Assessment Year 2016-17, arises against the CIT(A)-9, New Delhi’s Appeal No. 10236/18-19 dated 29.7.2019, in proceedings u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”).

2.

Heard both the parties at length. Case file perused.

3.

L ea rn ed c ou n s el su bmi ts th a t on a c c o u n t o f c omm un i cati on g ap s at va ri ou s l ev el s , th e a s s es s e e c ou l d n o t a pp ea r t o pl ea d an d p ro v e al l th e r el e van t fa ct s i n th e l o w er app el l ate p r o c e edi n gs a n d th e r e f or e , i n th e l a rg e r i n ter e st o f j u sti c e m e t i n c a s e, th e m att e r b e r e st o r ed b ac k t o th e C IT(A)/ NF AC . Th e R ev en u e ve h em en tl y su pp o rt s th e l ea rn ed l ow e r au th o ri ty’ s a cti on m aki n g th e a ddi ti on (s ) h e r ei n on m e ri ts.

4.

Be th at a s i t m ay , th e fa ct r em ai n s th at p o ssi bi l ity of s om e c omm u n i cati on gap s at va ri ou s l e v el s i n su ch an i n sta n c e of th e n ewl y i n tro du c e d vi rtu al h ea ri n g m ec h an i sm c ou l d n ot b e al tog e th e r ru l ed ou t. It i s th e r e f o r e d e em e d a ppr o pri at e i n th e l ar g er i n te r e st o f j u sti c e t o s et a si de th e as s e s s e e’ s i n s tan t ap p eal ba ck to th e C IT(A )/N FA C f o r h i s a f r e sh app r op ri at e adj u di c ati on , wi th i n th r e e e ff e cti v e o pp o rtu n i ti es o f h ea ri n g at th e ap p el l an t’s ri sk an d r e sp on si bi li ty, i n c on s eq ue n ti al pr o c e edi n gs . O r d e re d ac c o rdi n gl y.

5.

This assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.