High Courts(1996) 01 P&H CK 0044

Wazir Chand vs State of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 24 January 1996 · Citation: (1996) 1 RCR(Criminal) 702

HON’BLE JUDGES
M.L.Koul, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 132-M of 1996

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 177 words

M.L. Koul, J.

1.

At the instance of ASI Sardul Singh, Mr. Mann states at the bar that the petitioner has appeared before the Investigating Officer for the purposes of investigation but he resists the bail application on the ground that the main accused Neeraj Kumar and Mr. Suman are yet to be arrested because they were the main culprits who were receiving the money from the people. The petitioner appears to be remotely related with the commission of the crime at the moment and nothing is to be recovered from him. In spite of such circumstances of the case, it is directed that in the event of arrest the petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the amount of Rs. 50,000/ with one surety and personal recognition bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer subject to the stipulation that he shall cause his appearance before the police as and when called for investigation in writing for any date or dates as required by the police. This petition is disposed of accordingly.