High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 03 J&K CK 0020

WASEEM AKRAM vs STATE OF JAMMU & KASHMIR

Jammu And Kashmir High Court · Decided on 27 March 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
JANAK RAJ KOTWAL
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Pet. u OF s 561-A No. 185 OF 2017

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 273 words

Heard.

FIR No. 02/2017 of Police Station, Mandi, District (Poonch) under sections 279, 337 & 304-A RPC was registered on an information received at the

Police Station that a Maruti Car being driven by the petitioner met with an accident resulting into injuries to its occupants and one of the occupants has

succumbed to the injuries. Petitioner seeks quashing of the said FIR on the ground that he has been falsely implicated as he was not driving the car at

the time of the accident.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that even though the petitioner is in a position to produce the evidence to show that he was not driving the

car at the time of the accident but Investigating Officer is neither prepared to accept the evidence produced by him nor he is investigating the case to

ascertain as to whether person named in the impugned FIR was in fact driving the car or not.

The question raised is whether the person driving the vehicle at the time of the accident was the petitioner or someone else. Such a question can be

determined only on the basis of evidence to be collected by the Investigating Officer during the course of investigation of the case. Quashing of FIR

by seeking indulgence of this Court under section 561-A Cr. P.C. in such a matter cannot be sought.

Viewed thus, quashing of the FIR is refused and this petition is disposed of by issuing a direction to the Investigating Officer that, while ascertaining

the aforementioned fact, he shall also record and accord consideration to the evidence, if any, produced by the petitioner.

Disposed of.