High CourtsSingle Bench(2024) 01 MAD CK 0168

V.Velu vs State

Madras High Court · Decided on 29 January 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
C.V.Karthikeyan, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Original Petition No. 1449 Of 2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 342 words

C.V.Karthikeyan, J

1.

The petitioner/A2 in S.C.No.237 of 2023, now pending before the XX Additional Sessions Judge at Chennai, seeks bail. Originally, Crime No.1235 of 2012 had been registered by the respondent for the offences under Sections 341, 324, 307, 114 r/w 34 of IPC.

2.Since the petitioner did not appear before the Court a Non-bailable Warrant had been issued on 26.07.2023 and it had been executed on 21.08.2023.

3.It is stated that the matter is now posted for examination of prosecution list witnesses.

4.Taking all the factors into consideration and in order to give an opportunity to the petitioner to defend his case, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions:

5.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two fresh sureties (one surety must be blood relative of the petitioner), each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the XX Additional Sessions Judge, Chennai, and on further conditions that: -

[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b] the petitioner shall appear before the XX Additional Sessions Judge at Chennai, on every Monday at 10.30 a.m., till completion of trial, apart from the Court hearing dates.

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.