High CourtsDivision Bench(1914) 07 MAD CK 0031

Vungarala Seshayya and Another, Vungarala Sattirazu, Ganni Veerayya and Chintapalli Sattirazu and Another vs Tadapalli Subba Rao and Others Damisetti Venkataswamy and Others Vs Alla Narayanasawmy and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 13 July 1914 · Citation: 25 Ind. Cas. 61

HON’BLE JUDGES
Tyabji, J · Sadasiva Aiyar, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 98 words
1.

The jagir having been resumed by the Government, the property in question was neither a settled nor an unsettled jagir when the Estates Land

Act came into force and hence the definition of an estate in that Act did not apply to it.

2.

The Subordinate Judge rightly relied on the defendants'' (appellants'') own admissions in the muchilikas executed by them for his finding that they

had no occupancy rights in their respective holdings and that finding of fact cannot be questioned in second appeal.

3.

This and the connected second appeal are, therefore, dismissed with costs.